Tag: NYSE

16 stocks that have recently entered the Altman Distress Zone (a seriously elevated risk of bankruptcy)

Posted on by investing-scientist

These are sixteem/n names from NYSE and NASDAQ whose Altman Z-Score dropped recently, so that they are now in the so called Altman Distress Zone. A distress zone (Z < 1.8) means that a company has more than 80% of chances of bankruptcy in two years. The Altman Z-Scores were calculated for eight consecutive quarters, starting from the current one (Q1).

If you are unfamiliar with the Z-Score, its meaning and interpretation, here are some reads for you:

For  a listing of companies with nice and recently improved Z-Scores, see 18 healthy stocks that recovered from Altman Z-Score Distress Zone

The calculations were done in Python using data purchased from eodhistoricaldata.com (this is a referral link: if you register, I might earn $5).

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment.

Continue reading “16 stocks that have recently entered the Altman Distress Zone (a seriously elevated risk of bankruptcy)” →

18 healthy stocks that recovered from Altman Z-Score Distress Zone

Posted on by investing-scientist

These are eighteen names from NYSE and NASDAQ that have significantly improved their Altman Z-Score, recovering from the so called distress zone to the green zone. A distress zone (Z < 1.8) means that a company has more than 80% of chances of bankruptcy in two years. The Altman Z-Scores were calculated for eight consecutive quarters, starting from the current one (Q1). When populating the list below, it was also required that Piotroski F-Score is 7 or higher, indicating rather healthy companies with quality of their fundamentals above average.

If you are unfamiliar with the Z-Score, its meaning and interpretation, here are some reads for you:

The calculations were done in Python using data purchased from eodhistoricaldata.com (this is a referral link: if you register, I might earn $5).

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment.

Continue reading “18 healthy stocks that recovered from Altman Z-Score Distress Zone” →

Stocks you would rather avoid: relatively poor fundamentals compared with peers in same industry

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of fifty stocks that scored lowest in my screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of worst scoring stocks.

A listing of top 50 stocks is available there.

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment! Continue reading “Stocks you would rather avoid: relatively poor fundamentals compared with peers in same industry” →

Fifty buy candidates with nice fundamentals, judging from valuation, profitability, growth and health: Sept 9th

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of fifty stocks as of Sept 9th that scored highest in my recent screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of top stocks.

Compare with last week’s listing.

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment! Continue reading “Fifty buy candidates with nice fundamentals, judging from valuation, profitability, growth and health: Sept 9th” →

Stocks you would rather avoid (poor fundamentals)

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of fifty stocks that scored lowest in my screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of worst scoring stocks.

A listing of top 50 stocks is available there.

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment! Continue reading “Stocks you would rather avoid (poor fundamentals)” →

Stocks that rank highest in fundamentals, as of Sept 3rd

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of fifty stocks that scored highest in my recent screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of top stocks.

Compare with  previous listing .

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment! Continue reading “Stocks that rank highest in fundamentals, as of Sept 3rd” →

Six attractive stocks for today: a consensus strategy

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here is a couple of stocks that might be worth your attention this week. They were selected using a couple of criteria – most of them heavily rely an the company’s fundamentals; the analysts recommendations are only provided as a kind of support for the hand-picked names. This is why I’m calling the approach a consensus strategy. The stocks I’m going to present you below are generally believed to outperform the stock market in the coming months, they have a consensus recommendation of Buy, their fundamentals are scored considerably better than most stocks and their average target price by stock analysts is above current market valuation.

In order to consider buying the stock’s shares, the following criteria need to be satisfied:

  • TheStreet score: A+, A or A-
  • Zacks Rank: 1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold)
  • Weiss Ratings recommendation: A or B
  • Yahoo Finance recommendation: at least mixed Buy/Hold
  • Yahoo Finance target price: min. 5% higher than current price
  • Piotroski F-Score: min. 4
  • InvestorsObserver Overall Score: min. 50
Note: Descriptions of those criteria are provided at the end of this post as well as HERE.

Stocks you would rather avoid (poor fundamentals)

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of fifty stocks that scored lowest in my screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of worst scoring stocks.

A listing of top 50 stocks is available there.

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment! Continue reading “Stocks you would rather avoid (poor fundamentals)” →

Updated: Fifty stocks with quite strong fundamentals (valuation, profitability, growth, health)

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of fifty stocks that scored highest in my recent screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of top stocks.

Compare with last week’s listing.

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment! Continue reading “Updated: Fifty stocks with quite strong fundamentals (valuation, profitability, growth, health)” →

Top cheap stocks, based on their valuation, profitability, growth and overall health

Posted on by investing-scientist

Here’s my selection of cheap stocks that scored highest in my recent screening – for details see below. Briefly, for each stock from NYSE and NASDAQ for areas were assessed: Valuation (V), Profitability (P), Growth (G) and Health (H); then, the overall score (here: Score) was calculated and what you see below is an ordered list of top stocks.

See also my list of top scoring stocks and stocks with poor fundamentals.

Enjoy and don’t forget to leave a comment!

Continue reading “Top cheap stocks, based on their valuation, profitability, growth and overall health” →